Towards the state of exception?
01/08/2002
- Opinión
In spite of heavy police and military patrolling, for a second
consecutive day there has been sacking in the Uruguayan capital’s
slums. The same scenes are repeated over and over: hundreds of
displaced people sacking stores and hijacking trucks transporting food.
While downtown on the third day of a government decreed banking holiday
the only distinctive note are the long queues in front of ATMs, in the
suburbs there is a virtual state of war. Air Force helicopters hover
above and on the ground hundreds of police officers try unsuccessfully
to stop popular outbreaks with clubs and bullets. The situation is
such that even sports events have been suspended, because of the
impossibility of offering the usual police coverage as well as for the
fear that large gatherings could trigger vandalism.
In the middle of all this the Minister of the Interior, paper pusher
Guillermo Stirling, blames it all on a conspiracy against the
institutions, private property and the Uruguayan “way of life”. Last
night he expressed his firm belief that the events were “planned and
organized”, although he admitted he did not know “by whom” and said
that those actions want “to destabilize” and “disrupt the Uruguayan way
of life”. He asserted that it’s false that people are protesting
because of hunger, for “the State and many religious organizations are
giving thousands of food rations”, precisely in the areas where the
sacking is taking place.
Today (8/3(02) the Minister still insists on the conspiracy hypothesis,
explaining that “it’s a well marked strategy that provoked the events
in several parts of the city and with the same methodology”.
Undoubtedly paper pusher Stirling is right. For many years there has
been a conspiracy against the institutions, the way of life, and now
against the private property of Uruguayans. But the names of those
conspirators are the International Monetary Fund, US Treasury
Department, the Colorado Party and the National Party. The four of
them have been making a joint effort to drive the country into the
present situation, whose only beneficiaries will be international
banking, foreign capital and its local lackeys.
Weeks ago President Batlle accused those who warned about the
possibility of precisely what is happening at this moment (“corralito”
--or limitations on drawing funds from accounts-- and sacking) of
“watching too much Argentine television”. Facts have demonstrated that
Argentine newscasts of six months ago where a kind of futuristic
telescope pointed at the Uruguayan present. Television has been making
direct broadcasts, with an unusual emphasis, of sackings and its brutal
repression. As sacking and repression that brought about the fall of
President De La Rúa in Argentina were promoted by the Peronist right,
it is hypothetically possible that there could be a political operator
behind the sackings.
Several operators of the government coalition are hinting that the
radical left is promoting the marginal population’s direct actions.
Nevertheless, there is no evident advantage for radicals in promoting
the sackings. On the contrary, the radical left and the opposition in
general could be the worse off due to the consequences of this anarchic
rebellion of the poor against the poor. The operators of officialdom
already are circulating the rumor that the government is considering a
decree of “Prompt Security Measures”, a state of exception that
substantially limits public freedoms, and a resource amply used by the
Colorado Party in the administration prior to the dictatorship with the
objective of repressing the workers’ protests. The latest measures by
the coalition government and those that will be put in practice in the
near future (leonine Accountability, and Financial Stability Law) will
have terrible consequences for the Uruguayans’ income and quality of
life, and as of this moment a strong resistance from what’s left of the
working class could be expected. In the next few months society could
be shaken to its very foundations. What better way to anticipate
events than having the State of Exception decree ready for that moment
when contradictions will explode?
https://www.alainet.org/en/active/2399
Del mismo autor
- Mujica dispara contra la ultraizquierda, culpable del ascenso de Hitler 11/12/2010
- Doscientos años igual 12/05/2010
- Cómo que “ni vencedores ni vencidos”? 30/11/2009
- Apareció el “algo raro” que faltaba para poner en riesgo el triunfo de Mujica 06/11/2009
- Antes quiso ser el Che Guevara ahora quiere ser Lula da Silva 01/10/2009
- Mujica / Astori / Vázquez: no es lo mismo, pero es igual 25/06/2009
- Asco 08/03/2009
- La dictadura uruguaya y su corrupción ¿qué pasa que nadie investiga? 03/01/2009
- La rebelión de las bases 17/12/2008
- Si no hacen lo que él quiere, agarra y se va... 05/12/2008